

Also I referred to Artisteers html-page creation feature which indeed allows for dynamic page-widths. I don't have it installed any more because I don't like that one has to rent the Software. In short: Muse indeed is capable to do variable widths. You with your answer open up quite a few new cans of worms I did not suggest to discuss. I only reacted on your "(fixed)size is fine, most people don't maximize their Browswers anyway-comment". ***Edit to add*** Here is a link I once saved that I found for someone considering Muse and had written me. My mind just finds it harder than EW & DW to use. That is not to say it doesn't work just fine because I have seen some pretty nice sites made with it. I don't use Xara for building web pages with the exception of perhaps helping other people here and elsewhere. Maybe one day they will get code-bloat down.īut comparing Artisteer, a template creator for PHP-driven, CSS-controlled, CMS systems is sort of like comparing using MS Word for professional long-document print design to InDesign or another page layout application.
ARTISTEER FLUID WIDTH CODE
I find it easier to just edit the HTML/CSS of the core code of both platforms rather than use it anymore. But it does build extremely bloated code. I have used its bloated code for customizing a couple WP and Joomla sites. If they have changed that in the past few months, I would be interested in a link stating that.Īrtisteer. Adobe is considering one day moving to a more fluid layout scheme. Muse builds fixed-width/element/div placement. It would be great if Xara did this too.Glad I could provide a laugh. Should Developers read this: Adobe Muse and Artisteer (which are 100% wysiwyg) both do allow creatingĭynamic width-pages. Those who use overlapping windows might try what Alt+Tab does I personally would never not maximize windows of any program I have on disk.

I mean - do you have the slightest evidence for what you are saying? Hehe.that's the funniest argument I heard thus far to defend Xara's fixed width paradigm.
